Tea Party Candidate to Discuss ObamaCare
A nurse who is running for Congress will be in the Lehigh Valley to talk about ObamaCare on Wednesday.
The Lehigh Valley Coalition for Health Care Reform will present "Everything You Wanted to Know About How ObamaCare Will Affect Your Health Care Delivery (But Didn't Know Who to Ask)" at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday at the Bethlehem Area Public Library.
The program will include insight from health care providers into how President Barack Obama's health care reform bill will:
- Reduce access to care
- Inhibit the doctor-patient relationship
- Take medical decision-making out of the hands of medical professionals in favor of government-mandated "essential benefits" and "best practices"
The event will feature:
- Laureen Cummings, Republican candidate for the redistricted 17th Congressional District seat formerly held by Rep. Tim Holden, and CEO of the Lorimar Home Care and Staffing Service in Old Forge. Cummings is a nurse and founder of the Scranton Tea Party.
- Dr. Joseph Grassi, a Lehigh Valley physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist. He will focus on what doctors have learned about the new law since its passage and what it will mean to consumers.
- Dr. Thomas Bonekemper, a retired internal medicine specialist and past medical director of the Allentown VA Clinic, will also talk about the new health care law's effect on doctors and patients.
- Nurse Terry Ingalsbe, a member of the LV Coalition for Health Care Reform who actually read all 2,700 pages of the PPACA, will talk about how aspects of the PPACA in addition to measures enacted even before its passage will replace doctors' and nurses' best judgment with government mandated "cookbook" medicine.
Admission is free, but space is limited. RSVP by calling 1-888-698-4111 or e-mailing LVCoalition4HCR@aol.com.
Registration is available online at
www.Meetup.com/Lehigh-Valley-Coalition-for-Health-Care-Reform or
http://www.facebook.com/#!/events/140557196068403/.
Live streaming video of the forum will also be available at
www.ustream.tv/channel/coalition-for-health-care-reform.
The Lehigh Valley Coalition for Health Care Reform is a non-profit,
non-partisan grassroots coalition of concerned citizens and health
care professionals committed to educating the public about the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and other measures and
policies impacting America's health.
Frank
7:57 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
No tea for me. Thanks anyway.
Jim Gregory
9:35 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
None for me either..As soon as I hear the words "Obamacare" I know the speakers are most likely a bit unhinged..Most of us would have preferred single payer. However under the new law over thity million Americans who had no access to health care , will now have it...When the Republicans and their tea party friends have something better to replace the current system with, please let me know.
Rosemary B
11:10 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
I think it is ignorant not to look at the good and bad of this legislation. Yes some good has come of it, but a lot of bad stuff is coming. For example, it will be cheaper for companies to pay the fine and not insure their employees so in the end we may all lose out insurance and have to rely on the government to provide! I do not like that. Or the 3+ percent tax on real estate sales going to support this legislation that is coming down the road. I HATE that. What does Real Estate have to do with Health Insurance? We have to see both sides before we make a decision on whether to support something or not and it seems like some very intelligent people in this field will be speaking on this. I think it is worth a listen.
Keith
9:58 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
They do. It's called get a job with benefits and stop sucking on the government teat.
tracey
10:25 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Wow. What an ignorant, narrow-minded comment. There are many reasons why so many do not have health care, and you really expose your ignorance by lumping everyone into one category.
Salisbury Resident
10:50 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Fantastic comment! I wholeheartedly agree...I am eating my popcorn and drinking my tea.
tamarya
12:05 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
And what do you do to force your company to hold benefits, for employees, any suggestions? My husband drives truck and his company does not offer insurance, so now people that have bust your a** retail jobs, do you really think they offer insurance?
tamarya
12:06 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
And pre existing conditions, good job finding an insurance that pays for everything privately with pre existing conditions if obama is emliminated out of office. Because we sure know the republicians will screw that for us too. But they want to talk about the bad of obamacare.
tamarya
12:16 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Oh well, I have a pre existing condition, so you want them yanked from being covered, Just be glad to know next time you pay for medical services in lehigh valley, you are contributing to the MRI bill that insurance could not cover and we could not afford to pay, because insurance don't pay for the bill and the patient cannot afford it, guess who pays it. Thats right other patients in their insurance costs and medical services. So thanks ahead of time!!
Tim Killimaji
5:07 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
will you opt out of social security and medicare when you are old enough?
Carl W
8:58 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
You probably want Palin for President, too, right???
Donna Rovito
10:03 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Unfortunately, 16 to 18 million Americans will be dumped into Medicaid, which a third of providers can't afford to accept, so even though they have "coverage" they won't have better access to care. The worst part of the PPACA, though, is that, by their own estimates, following full implementation of the law in 2019, 23 million Americans will STILL BE UNINSURED. Dont know who "most of us" are who would have preferred single payer (which couldn't get PASSED so they took it out, which suggested that "most of us" DON'T want it), but "most of us" would like to see a return to the days when insurance was INSURANCE against catastrophic events and not maintenance.
Rosemary B
11:03 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Could not agree more!
Jim Gregory
11:32 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
The polling on the public option was about 75% in favor and 25% opposed..The single payer, or medicare for all was somewhere in that neighborhood but certainly favored by a strong majority of Americans..So, yes, I think it's fair to say that most wanted either single payer or at least a public option..However, the Republicans and their tea party friend have no options for the millions of americans without health care. None !!!!!! The poor already are on Medicaid..It's the unemployed worker and the workers with a part time job or a number of part time jobs that need this assistance. they are not loafers as the republicans and their tea party friends would have you think..With Obamacare 30 million more Americans will have coverage that dont have it now..Certainly, thanks to the Republican filibusters and opposition , that's the best that could be done now...But it is certainly better than not having health care at all for these families and their children. Again, what is the Republican alternative??
Rosemary B
7:41 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
A word from a Wikipedia article about those infamous polls:
"In contrast, a October 2011 Rasmussen Reports poll showed only 35% of respondents in favor of single-payer health care, with a plurality (49%) opposed.[67] Politifact rated a statement by Michael Moore "false" when he stated that "[t]he majority actually want single-payer health care."[68] Responses on these polls largely depend on the wording. For example, people respond more favorably when they are asked if they want a system "like Medicare," less favorably when stated as "socialized."[68]"
Jim Bond
11:36 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Shouldn't it be called "Everything You Wanted to Know About How ObamaCare Will Affect Your Health Care Delivery (As Explained By A Group Of People Who Don't Like ObamaAnything)"?
Liberalism is a mental disorder
1:02 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Scott Walker is a tea party candidate. He took a 3 billion dollar deficit in Wisconsin and turned it into a 150 million dollar surplus. We need more of that. Liberals just don't understand math or economics. They just want to do what makes them feel good, or look good. No sense for how anything gets paid for. Just a completely nonsensical outlook on the world.
tamarya
1:10 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
And do you think we are going to see that surplus. If I am not mistaken, republicians want school funding cut, they want social security for elderly cut. Obviously they want healthcare expenses out of governments hands. So yes, Scott walker did such a great job funding their own pockets.
Rosemary B
7:43 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
We are really mixing apples and oranges now! What does the surplus in Wisconsin have to do with the Healthcare Reform Bill?
Tim Killimaji
9:20 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Didn't the voters just recall him to start the process to kick him out of office?
Rosemary B
10:28 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Tim,Governor Walker just won his recall election with close to 60% of the vote over his Democrat challenger. I guess people in Wisconsin like having that deficit turned into a surplus and having jobs created in their state! Their unemployment rate is well below the national average. Obama could have similar results if he had been as successful with his policies.
Rosemary B
1:38 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Tamarya, you are putting the horse before the cart. The Republicans are not mean people who just woke up one day and wanted to cut all funding. The fact is that there is no money. The United States total public debt as of today is $15,728,112,402,859.92. That is a hell of a scary number! The U.S. government took in about $7,000 in revenue for every man, woman and child in the United States last year. It spent more than $11,000 per person. The gap between those numbers, about $4,000 per person, is the deficit, and it was covered by borrowing money. Can you seriously be in favor of continuing like this?Their are too many programs and no money to pay for them. Scott Walker is correcting this problem in his state and doing a great job of it. That is why he won the recall vote. And, yes, Republicans do want healthcare expenses out of government's hands. Government never runs anything well. And their projections on how much programs will cost are ALWAYS wrong.
tamarya
1:11 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
As we all continue to pay taxes and add to the surplus for nothing.
Tim Killimaji
5:06 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
seems to me this is a rabble rousing event rather than solutions to a problem, would love to see a televised debate rather than attend a one sided cash grab event. I thought the tea party didnt even exist anymore, kinda petered out like Santorium
Rosemary B
7:20 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Tea Party seems to be alive and well and able to evolve to the next level. And adding some balance to the over the top liberal/progressive/socialist idea's out there.
John
5:28 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Wow, if ignorance is bliss, then most on this blog must be VERY happy people. Here is a suggestion; why not wait until you hear what they say before throwing them under the bus, namecalling and ASSuming? God knows I sat and listened to our President and Ms. Pelosi, and then when the American people didnt like what they heard, Mr. Obama and Ms. Pelosi rammed it down our throats and past our sphincter. So now when someone opposes the present force-feeding, they are tea-partiers, or idiots. The fact that the plan thus far has done nothing but increase government mandates, take away common sense from those providing care and literally having no way to possibly pay for another free 30,000,000 Americans who cannot pay for themselves, I can see the concern that some have expressed today in the decision-making processes of our leadership between 2008 and 2010. Funny how we havent heard much from Mr. Reid and Ms. Pelosi in the last 18 months. I am pretty certain they havent retired or died, yet we remain stuck with their unilateral decision to fix healthcare. Feel like I am back in the mid 90's when the President's wife was gonna fix healthcare!
Donna Rovito
10:05 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
So no one cares about the 23 million Americans who will STILL BE UNINSURED even after ObamaCare takes effect in 2019? Anyone? Or the 16-18 million who will be given Medicaid cards - which a third of providers can't afford to accept - and who won't be able to access timely care from a government entitlement which is already insolvent in most states and will STILL end up in emergency rooms for care? Anybody?
Liberalism is a mental disorder
11:13 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
So you want to replace the insolvent government program with an even larger government program??
Kenneth Wildrick
10:43 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
It's always good to listen to differing opinions from individual health care workers. Keep in mind, though, that 2 of the most important voices of physicians, the AMA and American College of Physicians, have issued formal statements supporting the preservation of the ACA (Affordable Care Act). They represent thousands of physicians and a broader view than individual physicians. They recognize the need for improvements in the legislation but do not support repeal. There are many good features of the ACA, and they (and I, who am also a physician) feel it is better to reform it over time. Repeated improvements and reforms is the process the Medicare also took, and as a result Medicare is a very important part of our health care fabric - not perfect, but critical to our senior citizens. What would help is a conscious decision by both major political parties to actually confer and learn how to play together in the same sandbox. BTW, physicians hated and fought against Medicare in the 60's, but it turned out to effectively replace frequent bartering for health care with reasonable payment to doctors. Most physicians today don't want Medicare repealed but they would like to see more improvements, which are needed because of the dramatic changes in health care delivery today, the rise of subspecialties, geographic maldistributions of resources, and the like. We're in interesting times, and we can improve health care as a country if we respect each other and work together.
Liberalism is a mental disorder
11:12 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
ACA is an abortion. The Goverment does not implement ANY program effectively. Physicians also see a nice uptick in income. Also, the AMA gave their approval, not each physician. Just like a Union can give its approval to something that not many of its members support. The five or so physicians I have spoken with all support the REPEAL of ACA.
tamarya
11:46 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Well that is them, I do see where some physicians are against medicaid and medicare, because they are a hassle for physicians to get through to cover needed services, if they cover at all. One thing I would support is if private insurance was required to be carried and by more people being covered they could lower the monthly cost. Pre existing conditions still be covered and if you have a pre existing condition you are required to pick up a full coverage insurance that covers everything you need. If healthy then you can opt for a limited coverage if that is all you feel you will use. If we can cover our automobiles with insurance and no one argues that, why is being forced to cover health insurance for our well being an argument? Probably the reason no one argues automobile insurance is because it protects you from being sued to repair someone's car, or from being sued for medical expenses. However if hospitals would start filing suits to patients that do not pay their bills or arrest them for not paying, then the ones against ACA would be for it. However medical bills that are unpaid go on credit report and enventually they are gone with no action taken.
Rosemary B
1:43 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
People don't have a problem with car insurance because driving is a choice. If you do not want to buy car insurance you simply choose not to drive. Their is no such choice with the mandate, unless you choose not to live.
Carl W
4:28 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
If people would really listen to OBAMA, or someone objective who knows it well, they'd find it's actually a great idea. Not being able to pick your own doctor is and outright lie.
I seriously doubt they've invited someone educated in his proposal, who'd be in a position to question the accuracy of what these people are going to say. DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME !!!!
Rosemary B
5:10 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Unfortunately, Obama is a man of very poor character and a proven liar. I don't see how listening to him is going to help. I also do not think their are many objective people out there. This is a very polarizing issue. And anyone who disagrees with it tends to be called names and vilified.
i
tamarya
10:37 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
I say when this gets repealed by the millions of the adults or families that have no insurance, then maybe there is a point there. Probably as of now, every single person that is against it probably has insurance, so what do they care. And most people think nothing bad will happen to them, so I would say if they want to repeal it, hopefully karma strikes and they wind up without a job and their children wind up with no insurance, then at that point it will be too late to fix anything.
tamarya
10:38 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
And if they wind up with no insurance, themselves or their children have a pre existing condition and they completely get denied private insurance.
Rosemary B
10:46 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
Luckily, Obamacare is not the only solution out there. Hopefully they will find a way to keep the good and get rid of the bad and work towards some REAL reform that does not include a one payer system and too much government control in a part of our lives where the individuals, families and their doctors should be the only ones making the decisions. .
tamarya
3:59 pm on Saturday, June 9, 2012
I think the big thing rosemary, is they give to people that do not need it, meaning they give it to healthy adults because they find out they are pregnant, or they supply it to healthy children, even if the parents are making enough to cover their insurance. They need to keep it for people that need it that are ill or seniors that are retired. Even now my grandfather pays 200 a month for medicare, but yet a healthy child gets it free. As for now most insurances will even decline a child because of a health issue, they declined my son because he has an undescended testicle and was seeing a urologist, because it was damaged during a surgery. I think affordable healthcare should be what it is, which means affordable healthcare through insurance companies. I do agree it should not mean mandating government handouts for people that do not need it.
tamarya
4:01 pm on Saturday, June 9, 2012
And obviously the pre existing thing should remain too. If you are paying monthly for private insurance and you are making the initiative to get private insurance to cover your medical expenses to stay away from government assistance, then insurances should be forced to cover you.
Keith
5:32 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
Get off the message boards and go find health insurance before 2014 or Obama's gonna GET YOU!
tamarya
7:07 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
I heard it went through the supreme court.
Rosemary B
7:06 am on Friday, June 29, 2012
Hopefully it won't cost too many people their jobs or make too many people have to change their insurance from a plan they liked to something less. When my husband was unemployed I liked being able to choose between paying for health insurance or food! I guess the government and the supreme court has taken that choice away from us!