My husband Rick, who coaches a youth soccer team, was waiting with our 14-year-old son, Danny, for the rest of their team to arrive when they saw a teenage girl kicking a soccer ball. Rick asked the girl if she wanted to practice with his team and she politely declined.
That well-intentioned invitation earned my husband the moniker “creeper” from Danny, as in “Dad, you’re such a creeper.”
Now, my son doesn’t really believe my husband is a stalker or predator but it seems that these days any adult can be dubbed a “creeper” merely for speaking to a child he isn’t coaching, teaching or parenting.
Have we drilled one too many warnings into our kids so that they interpret the smallest act of friendliness on the part of an adult – in broad daylight with other children around – as “creepy?”
When I was growing up, I had adults in my life – parents of friends – who became second parents to me. True, I was closer to the mothers than the fathers, but by the time I was a teenager I felt comfortable talking with the fathers and I certainly didn’t consider them “creepers.”
I asked a couple of parenting experts if kids’ hyper-suspicion of adults is the price we pay for keeping children safe from real predators.
Rochelle Freedman, coordinator of Project Child, a program of Valley Youth House in Bethlehem, wasn’t ready to concede that.
“There’s too much fear and sometimes that takes away from children’s capacity to have relationships with well-meaning adults,” Freedman said.
Bill Vogler, executive director of Family Answers, a nonprofit counseling service based in Allentown, said his children have called him a creeper for the same crime of friendliness of which my husband was accused.
“I tend to be outgoing and gregarious and talk to strangers and they’ve called me the same thing,” he said. “I’ve always felt that teaching kids about ‘stranger danger’ is a two edged sword.”
For example, if a kid is lost at a mall, he needs to be able to go to an adult – but he should be advised to pick a mother with a stroller rather than a man in a trench coat, Vogler said.
Both Vogler and Freedman said parents’ focus on “stranger danger” obscures the fact that the vast majority of cases of sexual abuse of children are perpetrated by a relative or someone very close to the victim.
“When you study predators, they do not randomly choose victims…there’s a period of grooming,” she said. The best way to protect your children is to make sure they feel comfortable telling you anything, that they have peer relationships and aren’t otherwise falling through the cracks.
And they should be allowed to “go with their gut” instinct if someone makes them uncomfortable, Vogler said. “More often than not I think our gut can be right about stuff.”
So what do you think? Have we created a generation of hyper-suspicious young people and is that necessary to keep them safe?
Inadvertantly underscorring the belief that men are indeed creepers. How about a mother OR FATHER with a stroller.
To answer your question. 25 years of law enforcement experience. From 1998 to the present, I investigate child sexual abuse, child physical abuse and unexplained child fatality cases exclusively. I have investigated, cleared and/or arrested several hundred indivduals (male and female). I have taught investigations at the police academy, as well as in post secondary institutions. I have attended numerous seminars, conferences hosted by the National Center on Missing and Exploited Children in Alexandria, Va. The National Child Advocacy Center in Huntsville, Alabama, The Chadwick Center in San Diego, California The Crimes against Children Conference in Dallas, Tx. Several seminars provided by Fox Valley Technical College (under the auspeces of the U.S. Dept. of Justice) several courses provided by the U.S. Dept. of Justice conducted at Ft. Indiantown Gap. I have done independant research on the rational of preferential offenders. Please excuse any bad grammar, and thank you for adding to the discourse. I for one got a great deal of your post.